In the vast area that is Media & Communications, a multitude of theories and concepts shape our understanding of how messages are constructed, conveyed, and interpreted. One such theory that plays a pivotal role in this domain is Frame Semantics. This article further explores the concept of Frame Semantics and its relevance in the field of Media & Communications.
What is Frame Semantics?
Frame Semantics, initially developed by Charles Fillmore in the 1970s, is a linguistic and cognitive theory. The theory provides insight into how language is used to convey meaning and how this meaning is grounded in our cognitive structures. It says that words and phrases evoke mental structures, or “frames,” in the minds of speakers and listeners. Furthermore, these frames consist of knowledge, concepts, and beliefs related to a particular concept or situation.
Frames in Media & Communications
Framing in Media
Frames play a crucial role in media. These frames shape how an issue is perceived and understood by the audience. In defintion, media frames are the overarching structures or narratives that journalists, writers, and producers use to present information. For example, consider how the framing of a political event can influence public opinion. A frame that emphasises national security evokes different associations and emotions than one that focuses on economic implications.
Cognitive Framing
In cognitive science, Frame Semantics also helps us understand how individuals mentally organise information. When people encounter a word or phrase, they activate a frame associated with it. This frame influences how they process subsequent information. In media, this can then explain how certain terminology or imagery can trigger specific frames, leading to different interpretations.
Framing Devices in Media
Framing devices are storytelling techniques used in media to guide the audience’s interpretation of events. Let’s explore some common framing devices and their applications.
Metaphorical Framing
Metaphors are powerful framing devices in media. They bridge the unfamiliar with the familiar, using concepts and frames people already have. For example, describing a society as a “body” creates a frame that includes elements like organs, health, and illness. This metaphorical frame can then be used to discuss social issues, policy decisions, and collective well-being.
Visual Framing
Visual media, such as photography and film, use framing techniques to direct the viewer’s attention and interpretation. The choice of angle, framing within a frame, and depth of field can all shape how an audience perceives a scene. For instance, a low angle can make a character appear powerful and dominant, while a high angle can diminish their importance.
Framing Through Language
In written and spoken media, language plays a central role in framing. Specific words or phrases can activate certain frames and influence how information is processed. For example, describing an economic crisis as a “recession” versus a “depression” evokes different frames and emotional responses.
Agenda Setting & Framing Theory
Agenda setting and framing theories are closely related concepts in Media & Communications. They both explore how media shapes public perception.
Agenda Setting
Agenda Setting Theory suggests that media has the power to influence which issues are considered important by the public. The media’s selection and emphasis on certain topics can then set the agenda for public discourse. For example, when media outlets consistently cover environmental issues, they direct public attention to this topic.
Framing Theory
Framing Theory, on the other hand, focuses on how media coverage shapes the interpretation of specific issues. It suggests that the way an issue is framed can then influence how people perceive its causes, consequences, and solutions. For instance, framing a conflict as a “war on terror” versus a “criminal investigation” leads to different frames and responses.
Framing & Media Bias
Media Bias is a topic of ongoing concern. Frame Semantics helps us understand how Media Bias can manifest in coverage.
Partisan Framing
Media outlets with specific political affiliations often use framing to convey their ideology. This can be seen in the way they frame political events, candidates, and policy issues. Thus, partisan framing can reinforce existing beliefs and polarise public opinion.
Economic Framing
Economic interests also influence media framing. Media outlets may frame stories to cater to advertisers or sponsors. Therefore, this can affect the content and tone of their coverage. For example, a media outlet heavily dependent on pharmaceutical ads may frame healthcare issues differently from one that relies on automotive ads.
The Role of Social Media in Framing
The advent of social media has transformed the way information is framed and disseminated.
User-Generated Framing
On social media platforms, users actively participate in framing. They create and share content, using language and visuals to frame events and issues. This user-generated framing can also lead to rapid spread of information and diverse frames.
Viral Framing
Certain frames or narratives can go “viral” on social media, spreading rapidly and widely. These frames often resonate with emotions or shared values, making them more likely to be shared and engaged with by users.
Conclusion
Frame Semantics is a valuable concept in Media & Communications, shedding light on how meaning is constructed, conveyed, and understood. From metaphorical and visual framing to Agenda Setting and social media’s role, framing plays a pivotal role in the media landscape. Understanding Frame Semantics is not only essential for media professionals.
References
Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Situated Simulation in the Human Conceptual System. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(5-6), 513-562.
Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What Makes Online Content Viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192-205.
Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2010). Film Art: An Introduction. McGraw-Hill.
boyd, d., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
Chilton, P. A. (2004). Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. Routledge.
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103-126.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
Fillmore, C. J. (1976). Frame Semantics and the Nature of Language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280(1), 20-32.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
McChesney, R. W. (1999). Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. University of Illinois Press.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a Theory of Media Effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103-122.